Creation       Myths


MENU
  
MYTHS
  
MEANINGS
ARCHETYPES
  
PATTERNS
  
BEGINNINGS


Some Conclusions About the First Creation Story in the Bible

The Genesis 1 creation.

Genesis 1 Creation Examined, part 7


7   Some conclusions

Both Augustine and Martin Luther have as their main perspective on Genesis 1 that it must confirm their faith, in all of its details. They accept that there are confusing elements that they are unable to explain, but they refuse to settle for sometimes obvious solutions, which challenge their Christian beliefs in any way. The text is the truth, in their minds, so they just have to try to figure that unquestionable truth out.

Archetypes of Mythology. Book by Stefan Stenudd. Archetypes of Mythology

by Stefan Stenudd
This book examines Jungian theories on myth and religion, from Carl G. Jung to Jordan B. Peterson. Click the image to see the book at Amazon (paid link).

Psychoanalysis of Mythology. Book by Stefan Stenudd. Psychoanalysis of Mythology

by Stefan Stenudd
This book examines Freudian theories on myth and religion, from Sigmund Freud to Erich Fromm. Click the image to see the book at Amazon (paid link).

       Without this prerequisite, a reading of Genesis 1 hints at other explanations. The plural Elohim, supported also with some of the verb forms, strongly indicates that the root of this creation myth is to be found in some kind of polytheism. More gods than one were at the scene, when the world was created.

       This is quite plausible, since it is the case with most creation myths — also the ones being the closest to Genesis 1 in place and time. Monotheism is extremely rare, and almost as rare is a world creation taking place with only one god present. Gods are usually the first to appear and to multiply. This seems to have been the case also with whatever cosmogony Genesis 1 is based on.


God creates the land living animals, by Raphael Sanzio 1519.
God creates the land living animals, by Raphael Sanzio 1519.


       Since the process described in Genesis 1 is leading up to the creation of man, who is to rule and use just about all that was created beforehand, this is likely to be the part of a possibly more complex cosmogony — that part which tells the story of how man and his world appeared. Another part, lost or edited out along the way, may have described the appearance of gods, and the design of their domain.

       The distant and impersonal nature of the gods, Elohim, and the undramatic way in which mankind is created, indicates a mythology where the gods have a world of their own, and where they are rather indifferent to the appearance and continued adventures of human beings. This is quite a common setting in mythologies. The divine world is one of enough tidings and drama to keep the gods occupied, without their need to interfere the least with human affairs.

       The continued interaction between Jahve in Genesis 2 and mankind, seems way out of character for Elohim of Genesis 1, who has a very detached way of igniting the process of creation. It seems to be rather automatic after the very first act — that of bringing light to the world. Light separates the sky from the sea, its heat removes water and exposes land, and it is the main force in making life emerge from the sea, the air, and the earth.

       This initial step of bringing light is the most characteristic ingredient of Genesis 1, and a spectacular opening at that. The seemingly endless chaos of darkness and a primordial ocean is suddenly interrupted by light, like dawn repaints the landscape afore the naked eye. Each dawn the world is recreated, in as much as it again manifests itself. Each dusk the primordial dark chaos returns. This is a very ancient way of seeing the cyclic order of creation. And the creator god can have been none other, originally, than the sun.


Fiat. Let there be. Robert Fludd 1617.
Fiat (Latin for "Let there be"), the word by which God creates. This is a symbolic depiciton of how God's spirit in the form of a dove creates light. Illustration from Utriusque Cosmi Historia, by Robert Fludd, 1617.


       The mode of creation by ordering it is also quite characteristic for Genesis 1, not even recognizable in its sibling Genesis 2. "Let there be" can be seen as expressing a wish, but it also implies passivity. This god is not making the world as much as observing while it emerges. He wishes it, it happens, he watches it, and he is pleased. This is quite near the role of the spectator, and very far from the craftsman of Genesis 2 and most other creation stories. This detachment and passivity would make more sense if Elohim were just witnessing a process going on by itself within nature.

       Mainly, the distanced and detached process of Genesis 1 makes it clear why the Bible needed another creation story, with passion, drama, and personal interactions — that of Genesis 2. A people would find it very hard indeed to feel chosen and defined, with just Genesis 1 as the story of their coming into being.

Start:

1   Genesis — The Text



Genesis 1 Creation

The first creation of the Bible

  1. Genesis — The Text

  2. The seven days

  3. Good for man

  4. Commentaries

  5. Augustine of Hippo

  6. Martin Luther

  7. Some conclusions


This article was originally written for a seminar at the Department of History of Ideas and Learning, Lund University, as a part of my dissertation in progress on creation myths and their patterns of thought. Transforming the text to webpages, I have excluded footnotes, or edited them into the text.

© Stefan Stenudd




Some of My Books:

Click the image to see the book at Amazon (paid link).


Cosmos of the Ancients. Book by Stefan Stenudd. Cosmos of the Ancients
The Greek philosophers and what they thought about cosmology, myth, and the gods.

Life Energy Encyclopedia. Book by Stefan Stenudd. Life Energy Encyclopedia
Qi, prana, spirit, ruach, pneuma, and many other life forces around the world explained and compared.

Sunday Brunch with the World Maker. Novel by Stefan Stenudd. Sunday Brunch with the World Maker
Fiction. A brunch conversation slips into the mysterious, soon to burst beyond the realm of possibility.

Fake Lao Tzu Quotes — Erroneous Tao Te Ching Citations Examined. Book by Stefan Stenudd. Fake Lao Tzu Quotes
Erroneous Tao Te Ching Citations Examined. 90 of the most spread false Lao Tzu quotes, why they are false and where they are really from.

MENU


Creation Myths Around the World
How stories of the beginning began.

The Meanings of Mythology
Theories through history about myth and fable.

Archetypes in Myths
The mythological symbols and what they stand for.

The Logics of Myth
Patterns of creation.

CREATION MYTHS IN DEPTH


Creation in Rig Veda 10:129
The paradox of origin, according to an Indian myth.

Genesis 1
The first creation story of the bible scrutinized.

Enuma Elish
The ancient Babylonian creation myth.

Xingu Creation of Man
The insoluble solitude of gods and humans.

Contact
About Cookies

ON MY OTHER WEBSITES


Psychoanalysis of Myth
What Sigmund Freud and C. G. Jung thought about myths, their origins and meanings.

Myth of Creation
An introduction to the subject of creation myths and the patterns of thought they reveal.

Cosmos of the Ancients
What the Greek philosophers believed about the cosmos, their religion and their gods.

Life Energy
The many ancient and modern life force beliefs all over the world explained and compared.

Taoistic
Taoism, the ancient Chinese philosophy of life explained. Also, the complete classic text Tao Te Ching online.

Stefan Stenudd, author of fiction and non-fiction. Stefan Stenudd


About me

I'm a Swedish author and historian of ideas, researching the thought patterns in creation myths. I've also written books about Taoism, the Tarot, and life force concepts around the world. Click the image to get to my personal website.